Peter Warlow’s Tippe-Top Theory
When it comes to magnetic reversals of our planet, there remains the possibility that Earth may have flipped upside down. This may sound impossible, but the mass distribution of our planet appears to be similar to a pippe-top, and these can be flipped upside down without much effort.
This Tippe-Top theory was fist proposed by Peter Warlow, based on Immanuel Velikovsky book Worlds in Collision.
Earth’s uneven mass distribution
Earth has an uneven mass distribution, with most of the continents clustered north and most of the oceans to the south. This is most likely due to an asymmetric expansion of Earth’s crust. Over the years, this expansion may have influenced the Earth’s spin, making it at times quite suddenly flip on its axis.
Another possible impulse to make Earth flip like a tippe-top would be a sudden external jolt of some kind, like a hick-up in the Birkeland current that drives the auroras at the poles.
Earth’s expansion as seen from the south pole
Ancient myths
Adding to the plausibility of this theory is the fact that ancient myths mention catastrophic events where the Sun started to move in strange directions and the night sky became different. As pointed out to me by Greg Hummel, the ancient Egyptians tell of times when the sun rose in the west.
Clearly, such a reversal of our Planet’s orientation would be associated with much flooding and great upheavals. The great flood mentioned in the Bible, and the lost city of Atlantis mentioned by Plato, may all be related to a pole reversal.
The latest known geomagnetic reversal happened 41000 years ago, which would set the date of the great upheavals very far back in human history. However, there may have been a more recent and short lived reversal as well. The exact time and number of geomagnetic reversals have yet to be fully mapped out.
Related Posts
This Post Has 2 Comments
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Sir
The results of more than fifteen years of reflection and calculations on the laws of physics are presented on the website
MODÈLE D’ESPACE GRANULAIRE ANIMÉ – ANIMATED GRANULAR SPACE MODEL (MEGA)
https://www.kbj-modele.fr/
Direct access to the presentation:
https://www.kbj-modele.fr/index.php/telecharger-modele-mega/
I would be grateful if you would believe in the seriousness of this work, read the short presentation that is presented in the note to download, and let me know your opinion, your comments, or your objections.
Abstract
Albert Einstein justified and explained gravitation by the curvature of space-time. Based on a reflection on the nature and structure of space, an interpretation of this curvature is proposed.
It would be caused by variations in the speed of light (which Albert Einstein himself had envisaged) caused by the existence of masses, and the distortion of its trajectory according to the density of the material objects present. Gravitation would then be an emergent phenomenon.
On this basis, the shape of orbital velocity curves in a galaxy would find an explanation – the hypothesis of dark matter would not be necessary (§2.6.4).
A structural model of space is thus presented: space is the substrate of everything that exists and happens in it, it has a granular structure, and each grain is the site of changes, in dimensions that are not those of extension. The temperature is that of space itself – the agitation of atoms and molecules being only the consequence.
The process of energy exchange (Planck’s law) is specified on the basis of an analysis, on the basis of the granular structure of space, of the amplitude of electromagnetic waves: for very short wavelengths, the exchange would be lower than what Planck’s law predicts – the energy of the photon would no longer be proportional to the frequency.
And cosmic rays, whose spectrum is reproduced by the law thus nuanced, would have an electromagnetic origin (§3.3.3).
The MEGA model would not contradict Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. It proposes a common base.
Thank you in advance.
Kind regards.
Camille Georges Oudin
Thank you for commenting on this blog post. I’m always on the lookout for new theories, so I will most definitely read your paper, and I will give my feedback.
From reading the first pages of your paper, it appears that we are very much in tune when it comes to the need for a physical model of space and matter. We are also in agreement on the granular nature of space. It will be interesting to read on and find out more about your model.