Jupiter’s Large and Diffuse Core
According to measurements taken by NASA’s space craft Juno in the spring of 2017, Jupiter has a large and diffuse core. This was not expected by NASA’s astronomers who base their predictions on conventional theories about planet formations. However, Juno’s measurements fit well with the theory that all planets, stars and moons are born out of storms, and that this makes them hollow.
Planets born out of storms
The storms referred to above are not regular storms, of course, but the type of storms we find in the atmosphere of large planets. Stars are also likely to harbor such storms, and the whirlwind of collapsing plasma that are the supernovas that sometimes light up galaxies can also be considered storms of sorts.
If formed in this way, planets, stars and moons will be at their densest close to their surface, and each of these objects will have a hollow at their center, just like every storm has an eye.
As it turns out, this is now partially confirmed by NASA.
Juno’s measurements
Juno measured Jupiter’s core to extend up to half of Jupiter’s 70.000-kilometer radius. Out of the planet’s total mass, which is 318 times that of Earth, the core was measured to be no more than 7 to 25 Earth masses. That is 6 to 2 times less than the 40 Earth masses required to make Jupiter’s core as dense as its outer layers.
When we combine this with the fact that Jupiter has an overall density of 1.326 g/cm3, we find that its core must be substantially less dense than water while it’s outer layer is a good deal denser than water. We get an outer layer of mineral rich liquids and gases surrounding a gas filled core.
In other words, Jupiter must be considered to be a hollow planet.
This full-disc image of Jupiter was taken on 21 April 2014 with Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3)
By NASA, ESA, and A. Simon (Goddard Space Flight Center)
http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic1410a/ or http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2014/24/image/b/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=32799232
Related Posts
This Post Has 2 Comments
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
[…] seen as proof of this. For example, when NASA measured the density of Jupiter’s core, it was 60-80% less dense than the outer […]
It should be noted that the theory presented on this blog only supports the idea that large astronomic bodies are hollow. No other conclusion can be drawn from it.
The seismological evidence for a hollow Earth is laid out in Jan Lamprecht’s paper, and mainstream theory on gravity similarly supports this conclusion because there’s no gravity at the centre of gravitational bodies. This comes directly from Newton’s shell theorem which has been undisputed for centuries.
It follows that any cavity at the centre of a gravitational body will have no force to close the gap. There will of course be a lot of pressure in the walls around the gap, but pressure is not a force. Pressure cannot close a gap at the centre of a planet. Only gravity can pull matter into the hollow, and there’s no gravity at the centre of our planet.
On the other hand, stars, moons and planets spin on their axis. There’s therefore a constant force pushing heavy material out from the centre. Planets are also known to have earth quakes and volcanic eruptions. There are gas bubbles inside planets, and these are therefore likely to migrate towards the centre as heavy materials migrate out from the centre, all helped by occasional rumblings interior to these planets.
From this, we see that we have both theory and observational data in support of the notion that Earth and other astronomical bodies are hollow.