Mass is a central concept in physics. Yet, when people go looking for it by…
Jan Lamprecht’s Hollow Earth
When we apply Newton’s shell theorem to gravity, we come to the conclusion that there’s no gravitational force at the center of large bodies like moons, planets and stars. This means that a central hollow, once formed, will not go away because there’s no mechanism to make this happen. Earth and other planets are therefore likely to be hollow.
Conditions at the core
The internal wall of any cavity inside our planet is likely to repel itself due to electrostatic charge.
There’s also our planet’s rotation. It pushes dense matter up and away from the center, thereby letting less dense matter flow down and into the center. The pressure inside the cavity might therefore be relatively low.
There will be enormous pressure in the wall surrounding such a cavity, but the pressure in the cavity itself may be low enough to allow for a gas filled core.
Internal distribution of matter
Should a part of the internal wall come loose, the cavity won’t shrink. The loose matter might float around in the cavity for a while. But it will soon fall back onto the wall.
The cavity will remain intact unless the planet collapses. However, a spherical shape doesn’t readily collapse. Besides, there’s pressure inside planets that makes collapse all the less likely.
Cross section of a hollow planet with internal electrostatic pressure
From the above, we can conclude that there’s an overall tendency towards less density at the center of large bodies.
The lack of gravity at the core implies a one way mechanism where high density matter moves upwards while low density matter moves towards the center.
This means that planets can be modeled as being at their most dense at the surface, and least dense at their core.
Jan Lamprecht’s paper
When Jan Lamprect wrote his paper on hollow planet seismology vs. solid Earth seismology, he noted that this kind of planets will yield the easiest and most straight forward explanation for seismic data.
Jan Lamprect concluded therefore that Earth is hollow, with a low density interior and a high density crust, exactly as expect from our analysis.
Expanding planets
Furthermore, a gas filled hollow at the center of our planet makes it easier to argue for an expanding Earth. We no longer need new matter to be synthesized for expansion to occur. The gas filled core will simply expand to fill the growing internal cavity.
We can also expect expansion to accelerate for some time after it has started. Because a crack, once formed, will expand due to internal pressures. The expansion will only slow down once pressure is alleviated.
This matches what Dr. James Maxlow, a prominent proponent of expansion tectonics, has concluded from his analysis of geological evidence.
Conclusion
Both theory and data support the idea that planets are hollow, and that some planets, including our own, are expanding.
Related Posts
Comments (2)
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
I was just about complete on typing a comment when a pop-up said I must click to accept this website’s policies. When I did, my comments disappeared.
I’ll attempt to retype those comments.
https://agm2m.org/ “Anything Goes M2M Discussion SIG”
Some 10 years ago, I started a section in the discussion group in which I attempted to theorize what principles and their effects might be if celestial bodies were hollow (including the Sun).
One of the primary arguments against any Hollow Earth theories was seismological P-Wave data. Scientists assert P-Wave data proves the Earth must be solid.
At first, I presumed that was likely the ultimate proof against a Hollow Earth. A few weeks later, I returned to the webpage describing that proof and realized, scientists had interpreted the P-wave data in a manner which supporter a solid Earth. Their interpretation was biased; and wrong.
If seismological P-wave data is interpreted correctly, it reveals the Earth must be hollow.
You are absolutely correct. The “proof” used to defend the solid Earth model is circular. They start out assuming that planets are solid to the core. This leads to a complicated model in which our planet consists of several layers, including a “super-dense” core.
However, as Jan Lamprecht pointed out in his paper, if we start out assuming that planets are hollow, no layering is required. Everything works perfectly without the need for a complicated geology.
The only problem with Jan Lamprecht’s interpretation is that there appears to be some missing mass. Surface gravity cannot be explained. But this problem exists only because we assume that gravity is due to inertial mass alone. If we propose that charged matter has higher gravitational pull than neutral matter, the problem solves itself because hollow planets can hold a great deal of charge.